Tag Archives: fiction

Review: The Etched City

This is the second in a series of reviews I am doing based on a reading-list which was inspired by Adrian Tchaikovsky’s proposal for a micro-sub-genre of Speculative Fiction which he has labelled Fantastical Realism. These are novels in which charatcers with low status or limited power inhabit a world (usually a city, usually in some state of early industrialisation) which is fantastical to us but mundane to its inhabitants, until the introduction of something new, or some changed condition, disrupts their world.
My first review in the series was of Tchaikovsky’s own City of Lost Chances.

KJ Bishop is an Australian author (and fellow Melburnian). Published in 2003, The Etched City is her debut novel after she had previously been focussed on short fiction, and it was recognised with a nomination for the World Fantasy Award as Best Novel, and with the Ditmar Award for Best Novel, as well as Bishop herself being recognised with the Ditmar for Best New Talent.

I struggled with this novel, and I’m struggling with articulating my thoughts into a review of it. Like the novel iteslf, my thoughts on it are shifting and hard to pin down into the concrete.

Initially, I was taken in by the world Bishop described and the characters inhabiting it. We join Raule as she moves across the blasted desert-scape of Copper Country and its clear from the start that both the world and Raule herself have a rich history. We are joining her at this point in her story, but it has more the feel of a denouement than an opening. Raule had been a revolutionary in a failed revolution, and now, brought low, on the run, the climax of that story is already in her past. Her path intersects with Gwynn, a fellow-revolutionary and a former-colleague. They make an interesting pair, alike in many ways and opposed in others. Both capable of violence, though Gwynn is ruthless where Raule is methodical, Gwynn embraces the opportunity for violence where Raule accepts the necessity of it. Together, in an alliance more of circumstance than of conviction, they flee their pursuers as long as they can, before they inevitably need to make their stand.
The Copper Country setting has been described in other reviews as a blend between that American ‘Wild West’ and a mythologised ‘Arabia’ of bazaars and camel-trains. As an Australian reader it has more of the feel of the Outback to me, that vast interior of the continent in which red dust plains stretch horizon-to-horizon, towns spattered onto the landscape like bird droppings, and the ruins of colonial structures crumbling back into the sands. Other than the lack of cars, bikes and trucks, Copper Country could call to mind the backdrop of Mad Max.
With compelling characters in a complex relationship and an interesting landscape, and with the tension of the pursuit driving the narrative forward, this section of the novel drew me in and had me turning pages, but after the desperate stand against their pursuers, the novel takes a dramatic shift.

The second section of the novel, and the much larger bulk of it, take place far from Copper Country, in the city of Ashmoil.
A crumbling, shifting, decaying, vibrant, crowded city built on the banks of a broad river amid dense jungle, Ashmoil operates as a port for trade, a haven for criminals, a territorial battleground for gangs and a marketplace for art, drugs, guns, slaves, sex, and possibly for magic. That ‘possibly’ is there because Ashmoil is an ambiguous place, as the novel itself is ambiguous, and the line between potions and drugs is just as blurred and uncertain as the lines between claivoyant and charlatan, between mystic and mythology, between moral and immoral.
Raule finds work in a hospital among the city’s slums, acting as both nurse and midwife to the poor, using her war-time experiences of medicine to stitch up the wounds of the young knife-fighters after their ceremonial duels.
Gwynn finds work as a ‘cavalier’, a paid retainer for one of the city’s more successful crimelords. Part-mafioso, part-assassin, part-bodyguard, part-errand-boy. Always too well-dressed and well-mannered to be merely a thug, he spends many of his days in hedonistic pursuits: gambling, drinking, smoking, womanizing… a life of leisure punctuated by acts of violence.
Both are amoral in their work, though differently: Raule’s morality worn down to a nub by hardship and circumstance; Gwynn’s morality silenced by necessity and apathy.
Both are better trying to understand the city they inhabit: Raule through the study of the several deformed infants who die in the womb or shortly after their birth; Gwynn in his search for the artist who etched a cityscape in which Gwynn himself appears in the background.

I struggled with the early Ashmoil section of the novel because it is not plot-driven and I kept trying to find the plot. I kept trying to force the story to conform to my expectations, rather than allowing myself to discover the story as I went.
Oh, I this is a story of Gwynn’s search for an artist and the secrets he discovers when he reveals her? But it’s not that.
Oh, I this is a story about the mysterious cause of the birth defects, and how Raule finds a way to respond to that cause? But it’s not that.
I kept trying to find a clear protagonist and a clear antagonist, but found neither. Or perhaps found multiple. Or perhaps it is too reductive to approach the story in those terms. There is no overarching goal which the characters share, no central conflict to be resolved, or central question to be answered. Events occur and the characters respond or react. In some instances their lives are changed by these events, in other instances they continue on.
The middle of the novel is more a selection of sub-plots than a unified narrative. The main characters have little to do with each other, their stories running most often in parrellel with only a few moments of intersection, such as the corrupt priest who is both an administrator at Raule’s hospital and a theological/philosophical debating partner for Gwynn. One of Gwynn’s colleagues becomes obsessed with his employer’s songstress, Raule tries to help the mother of a young man she treats, a civil war is brewing and arms must be provided (to both sides and at great profit from each), the precarious balance of power between the crime families and the authorities shifts in ways that sometimes favour and sometimes threaten Gwynn’s employers…

I enjoyed the novel much more once I stopped trying to make it something it wasn’t. Once I accepted it as an examination rather than a narrative. A meditation on some big questions about morality and reality. Here is a city, and here are the lives of some people who inhabit it, and this is how they see their world and how they live those lives.

When Gwynn finds the artist, Bethine, who etched his image into her representation of the city, he falls (perhaps) in love and his deepening connection to her coincides with (or perhaps causes?) his own life and the city of Ashmoil itself to become increasingly fantastical. Both the novel and the city take on an ethereal, dream-like quality. It becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish the actual events of the narrative from dream sequences, drug trips and introspection. The character and nature of Bethine, and of the art she creates, are uncertain. It’s unclear if Gwynn is her muse or her subject, just as it is unclear whether she creates art from the city, or the city is created from her art, or the city itself is an artwork, or a dream, or an hallucination.

And in the final section of the novel, some of these various disjointed threads are stitched together into a final act. Or perhaps it is more apt to say that some of the story seeds germinate and propogate and blossom into a final act. Decisions are made. Overdue consequences belatedly arrive. Violence begets violence begets violence. Betrayal requires revenge. Some lives end in tragedy, others in sacrifice, others merely end, though death may not be the end it was believed to be. In mortal wounds, flowers bloom.
Few mysterious are solved, and the city–stranger now than it was when first introduced–is irrevocably changed.

This is one of those novels which embedded itself in my mind and which kept returning to my thoughts, unbidden, for many months afterwards. Fragments of images. The memory of scenes. Moments in the lives of the characters or in the city.
It is inventive and imaginative, excellently written and meticulously crafted. It fits very well into the subgenre Tchaicovsky proposes of Fantastical Realism.

Midway through I was expecting it would be closer to 3 Stars. Straight after I finished it I would have had it at a solid 4. Check back with me in the months or years to come and it may well be a 5.

Right now, as I complete this review: 4.5 Stars.
Would recommend to anyone who enjoyed Perdido Street Station and City of Last Chances, though with the caveat that it’s closer to the former than the latter, and more meandering and less structured than either.


Review: City of Last Chances

City of Last Chances is the first book in Adrian Tchaikovsky‘s Tyrant Philosophers series, and was my first exposure to Tchaikovsky as an author. It is also the novel which prompted me to explore the rest of the series, and more of his works, and more of his ideas and thoughts on writing, and thus ultimately to the suggestion he made on Bluesky and elsewhere, that there was a small niche of similarly concerned works within Speculative Fiction for which City of Last Chances is an exemplar, and which he came to label Fantastical Realism.

I have discussed here on this blog (and over on Bluesky) how my reading in recent months was shaped by exploring this suggested sub-sub-genre and the various examples Tchaikovsky gave in defining/describing it, and in coming weeks I’ll add more reviews of those knowledge, but the best place to start is right here where the whole project was inspired, on the gritty streets of Ilmar, the eponymous city, and among the various bureaucrats, soldiers, monks, demons, patriots, professors, conjurers, thieves and priests who inhabit those streets.

The spoiler-free review here is probably apparent in that it inspired a whole reading journey. This is right up my alley, and will likely be up your alley too, if your alley twists through semi-industrialised factories, crowded with magicians and mystics and thieves and beggars, with gods and ghosts hiding in the gutters.

Ilmar is a complex blend of magic and myth, politics and power, theology and technology. The city has been recently defeated/colonised/invaded by the powerful Palleseen, an empire which is motivated by the pursuit of ‘perfection’, and whose manner of that pursuit is the rigorous application of rules which dictate every aspect of daily life for the Ilmar residents. Among those residents are a formerly-ruling aristocracy clinging onto ceremonial and symbolic power by collaborating with the Palleseen; the collectivist labour movements of ‘Siblingries’ of workers who toil in the factories of the city; the students and lecturers of the ‘Gownhall’ who are trying to maintain their political and academic independence; the Allorwen refugees whose way of life was marginalised and mistrusted even before the arrival of this new colonial power; the organised criminal syndicates that control the underworld parts of the city which other powers cannot reach; and the last dregs of the beleagured and outlawed religions which were once dominant but have now been largely crushed in the name of ‘Perfection’. Perhaps most-strange of all, a grove of trees still standing in an ancient wood, the ‘Anchorwood’, within which will intermittently open a portal to other worlds, and by this grove a tavern, staffed by those who can facilitate travel and trade through this portal… for the right price.

Tcahikovsky gives us perspective characters from each of these groups, and often multiple charatcers within a group so that the internal divisions and disputes are revealed. It’s a complicated cast, and sometimes a complicated task for the reader to make sense of each perspective, especially when the same event is viewed so differently by different parties, but this complexity is a strength of the novel. It allows Tcahikovsky to gives us a detailed and thorough overview of the society in which these characters operate, along with an intimate and personal view of their challenges and troubles.

While there is no real protagonist, per se, it was Yasnic who remained the most central figure in my understanding of events. The last priest of a very minor God of healing (so minor that he has no other name than God), Yasnic is trapped in a very personal relationship with his cantakerous and demanding deity. Yasnic is not a figure of great power or influence, often not even a figure of significance, but he is a sympathetic character, a well-meaning man burdened by his oaths and obligations, and yet unable to set them aside. He provides a moral centre to the novel (albeit a resolutely deontological one), and because he moves through the city in a way that a more prominent or more public figure cannot, he becomes a narrative unifier, interacting with other characters in oblique ways and tying various narrative strands together, allowing the reader to gather the intricately knotted stories, untangle them slowly and weave them into something larger.

It is a character-driven novel, and it is in those characters that its greatest strengths are clear, but it is well crafted in many other ways as well. The writing is highly engaging, with some memorable quotes and phrases. The plot moves along at a good pace, rarely sagging, rarely rushed, some twists-and-turns which are to various degrees unpredictable. The mysteries presented are strange and intriguing and reach satisfying revelations. The world-building is careful and considered and highly detailed, both fantastical and plausible, filled with both novel imaginative wonders and familiar themes. The stakes ratchet up, actions have consequences, petty motivations derail grand plans, people’s faults and foibles can harm themselves and those around them even when motives are pure. Motives are not always pure.

With such a large cast and with so many plots and sub-plots running simultaneously you do sometimes find yourself in the view of one character when you’re keen to find out how another is progressing. The novel has a lot to say and each character provides us with a lens through which to examine some weighty themes: the brutality of colonial oppression, the resistance of the oppressed, the limits of unification in a hierarchical labour force, the effects of lost faith, the relentlessness of obligation, the costs of our commitments, the ways in which we are able to convince ourselves to do the things we feel we must do, the reasons we provide to ourselves when we are unable to do the things we cannot.

As more and more peices are added to the board, and as their connections complexify, and as each characters personal motivations come increasingly into conflict with others, it seems that it will be a difficult task to bring all of the ambitious threads together for the conclusion, it is finely done and Tchaikovsky sticks the landing.

So 5 Stars, from me.

I would highly recommend this novel, especially to any reader who enjoyed Mieville’s ‘Perdido Street Station’ or similar ‘New Weird’, or the kind of Fantasy which of more about an early-industrial era rather than the medieval, perhaps something like Abercrombie’s ‘Age of Madness’ series, or to those readers who are as interested in the political machinations of Fantasy worlds as they are in the magic and mythology of them.


A reading journey

In November of 2024, on Bluesky, Adrian Tchaikovsky (@aptshadow) put forward the suggestion of a small subgenre within Speculative Fiction which he defined in the skeets below, and expanded on in Episode 2 of the Starship Alexandria podcast with Emma Newman where he put forward the term Fantastical Realism.

In doing so, Tchaikovsky put into a clearer perspective and gave a frame of reference to a much more vague sense I had also been experiencing that there was a type of Spec Fic which I particularly enjoyed, set in a metropolis, but not Urban Fantasy; not-exactly Fantasy, but also not-exactly Sci Fi. Strange in ways that evoked the New Weird, and perhaps overlapped with much of how one might understand that subgenre, but those venn diagrams didn’t make the perfect circle. These ‘Fantastical Realism’ works present us with worlds in which there were elements which were fantastical to us, but mundane to the people inhabiting the world (for instance Perdido Street‘s Khepri, Vodyanoi, Garuda, Cactacae and various other sapient races share New Crobuzon without finding each other especially remarkable). These are grounded worlds with norms and expectations and structures which are different from our own, but which are reliable and familiar to the characters. We might be shocked when the club bouncer is a 7’ tall sapient cactus, but it is to be expected for the characters who live within New Crobuzon. The stories then shift once a new element is introduced, something which is fantastical both to the reader and the the characters, something which alters or changes those worlds.

I had also recently finished writing a manuscript which I had struggled to define/confine to genre when pitching to agents and the comp titles and qualities/features Tchaikovsky was suggesting for the micro-genre of Fantastical Realism seemed to fit well with what I was exploring in my writing. So… I resolved to do a proper exploration of these semi-charted territories, and to use the list of titles Tchaikovsky had provided as a kind of cartography for my journey.

So I got to work on putting together a reading list, and I dived in, and over the next little while, I’ll try to regularly post up reviews of the novels I have read (some I had read already, and loved, such as in the case of Perdido St Station, my recognition of Mieville’s work is all over the archives of this blog). Among which is Tchaikosky’s own Tyrant Philosophers series, as well as the Divine Cities series by Bennett and the standalone Etched City from Bishop mentioned in the screenshot below, as well as others that seem to fit the proposed ‘sub-sub-region’ I’m exploring.


In the Supermarket (2014)

In the supermarket things are getting restless.

People shuffle in the queue for the self-scan machines, glaring passively, harrumphing at no one in particular, but pointedly and with feeling.

At the self-scan machines things are little better. Toes are tapped at tardy assistants. Red lights blink. Calm mechanical voices ask for items to be added or removed from the bagging area. Shrill human voices imprecate.

There is a man – short and sullen, overladen with fruit – who cannot pay for his rockmelon. An assistant finds it for him. It is under M, because it is a melon.

‘I have complained about this before. It is a rockmelon. It belongs under R.’

‘Not much I can do about it sorry.’

‘There is. You can record my complaint. I want to make an official complaint.’

Together they look to the complaints counter. It is oppressed by the crowd that has gathered there. Its defenders are inadequate, soon to be overwhelmed.

The assistant shrugs.

The sullen vegetarian snarls, his teeth clacking and his eyes all a-spark.

‘I’ve complained about this before. It’s not good enough. It’s a waste of your time and mine.’

The assistant shrugs.

The vegetarian’s eyes bulge. Veins rise on his neck, at his temples.

‘Excuse me,’ says a tall woman. Her body is a work of art, and a canvas. Lean and pretty. Coloured inks on her arms, her thigh, her décolletage. ‘There’s three machines not working.’

Red lights are blinking over the three machines.

‘Just a minute,’ the assistant says.

From somewhere in aisle three there’s a predatory howl.

The queue for the machines surges.

A display of produce crashes to the ground, shattering glass and spilling preserves and spreads marked down for quick sale.

At check-out number seven there’s a young girl’s scream.

At the complaints counter the splintering of wood and a panicked cry.

A fist in thrown.

Teeth spill, skipping across the polished floor.

A head strikes a counter with a wet crack.

There’s the smell of blood and violence in the air.

The vegetarian leaps upon the assistant, bears him to the ground where others rush in with boots and stomping feet for them both.

Someone tries to climb the bread aisle, to safety, but the whole thing topples and they fall into the surging mob.

Men are vaulting the complaints counter, clawing at their victims, bursting throats between their teeth.

I take my receipt and the goods I’ve purchased. I step away, through the automatic doors, past the buskers splintering their guitars against each other, past the collisions and chaos of the car park, to my car.

Best to get home. The kids will be wanting their dinner.


Fact in Fiction

This morning something happened to me which was so trite and clichéd I would have been embarrassed to have written it.

Just near my house a car sped through an intersection, the passenger door swung open and a woman inside half flung herself out screaming “Help me please! Somebody help me!”. The car pulled over and I went to help, and interrupted an apparent situation of domestic violence. I convinced the driver to let the lady out of the car and he drove off. For her part, once she was out of the car, she wanted nothing from me but to get away and offers of hospitality or kindness or further assistance were declined. She went on her way and I had the sense that the situation was unresolved. I warned her he could easily come back, and sure enough when she was half a block away he did. There was no more violence and he spoke to her briefly before driving off again and she walked away. I called the police but they couldn’t do much without her reporting the incident or making a complaint against him.

I post this here because once the adrenaline had died down and my head was returning to normality my first reaction was: there’s a story in this.

Perhaps that is the life of the writer: that all the events we observe become fodder for our craft, grist for our mill.

My next reaction though was that it was too unrealistic – too clichéd! Are we supposed to believe our narrator just happens to be at that intersection, at that time? Are we supposed to believe the antagonist just drives off? That the ‘damsel’ rejects her rescuer as quickly as she rejected her attacker? And what kind of ending does this story provide. In the denouement does she return to the abusive relationship? Is the climactic intervention of our protagonist entirely pointless, merely a temporary disruption to the status quo?

It occurred to me that if this tale were to make good fiction it would need some serious amendments and revisions – perhaps some heavy re-writes.

So what role does fact have in fiction? and how beholden are we as creators of fiction to fact?

China Mieville populates his world with living cacti, scarab-headed beauties and trans-dimensional spider-gods, they move amid forests of frozen lightning, clouds of gaseous rock and cities polluted by thaumaturgic effluent, and yet they work because there are some facts that make them relatable. People are greedy and kind and nasty and brutal and selfless and contradictory, exactly as we know them to be. They behave factually in the most fictitious setting. Lord of the Rings works for the same reason (though despite Tolkein’s objections it is easier to read as a bucolic allegory of post-industrialism). Star Wars likewise: inter-stellar travel, alien races and an inexplicable Force (midichlorians be damned – The Force should not have to be explained) but amidst that a relatable human story (boy meets girl, boy likes girl, girl likes smuggler, Wookie misses out on a medal, boy is trained by a muppet backpack, boy and girl are siblings… the usual).

Conversely “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter” opened this week. If I type ‘Abraham’ into Google the auto-search function has ‘Abraham Lincoln’ as top suggestion, and ‘Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter’ second. Here the setting is ostensibly (in that Steam-punk / Alt-history way) a factual one. Real historical figures at a real point in history, acting out a plot of pure fiction. To what extent then do the writers owe us a ‘factual’ Lincoln. I suspect to no extent whatsoever.

And what then of the cases on the indistinct borders of these realms. What of the ‘based on an extraordinary true story films/ Films like ‘The Blindside‘ for instance, which presents the story of Sandra Bullock pulling Michael Oher out of ghetto-crack-oblivion, teaching him to play football, giving him Kathy Bates to lift his GPA and basically providing him with professional sporting success. A great story of heart-warming selflessness and triumph over adversity. To what extent did this film owe us such facts as Michael Oher’s recognised success in football pre-existing the intervention of Sandra Bullock’s character (he had achieved all-state selection and was rated 5th best lineman prospect in the country a year before he met Leigh Anne Tuohy), or that he lifted his GPA by taking online courses through Brigham Young University; scoring As in English to replace the Ds and Fs he was awarded in school?

Is the story not better if he comes into her care hopeless and becomes exceptional? Doesn’t that work better as a narrative arc? Isn’t it better fiction if his sudden success can be traced to a single inspirational speech rather than a montage of repetitive training? I think undoubtedly so.

So perhaps I will use my experience for a short story. It will be ridiculously over the top and require a great suspension of disbelief… and you will know those are the factual bits.

As TVTropes point out, reality is unrealistic, and as a famous Australian children’s author once said: “Never let the truth get in the way of a good yarn”.